Ask Captain Lim ~ All about Aviation

Monday, 12 May 2008
Home arrow Airways arrow Height loss with one engine, flight routing and fuel issue...
Monday, 12 May 2008
Main Menu
Home
Welcome
Ask Me
Forum
Disclaimer
Privacy
Search
Links
Pilot Career
Becoming a Pilot
Female Pilots
Education
Medical Examination
Eyesight
Height
Age
Interviewing Process
Aptitude Tests
Flight Simulator
Training
Technical Questions
OnLine Stores
Professional Pilot
General
Licenses & Ratings
A320 Training Videos
Salary
Job Opportunities
Flying
Air Travel
Airways
Ditching
Dr JB Lim's Corner
Emergencies
ETOPS
Fear of Flying
Flying on the Boeing 777
Flying the Plane
Medical
Profession
Pilot Career
Aviation
Airlines
Airplanes
Airports
Air Crash
Air Crash Investigations
Air Safety
Humor
B777 Photo/Routes/Seats
Video
Stories, Truths & Myths
Weather
Air Turbulence
Contrails
Crosswinds
Icings
Lightnings
Night Flights
Thunderstorms
Windshears

Click Here for Searches on Weather News & Forecast

Google
 


Height loss with one engine, flight routing and fuel issue...

Written by Capt Lim, on 06-09-2005

Published in : Flying, Airways

Hi Captain Lim,

Thanks for your very informative web site - it?s a very interesting read!

I've got three questions for you:

Firstly, what is the altitude penalty of losing an engine whilst cruising on a twin jet airliner such as the Boeing 777? Would it cause a problem traveling over mountainous areas en route such as Hong Kong to Europe? Also, does a twin-engine aircraft such as a 777 or A330 sometimes have to take a longer indirect route than a 747 or A340 because of this?

Secondly, I've noticed that some flights, even by the same airline using the same type of equipment, vary on routes such as HKG (Hong Kong) to LHR (London-Heathrow). I know that routings can vary somewhat due to the weather, but on flights between Europe and the Far East, they can vary by thousands of miles.

What is the reason for this? Is it due to political factors such as over flying rights, weather conditions or congestion? Could flight times be reduced if aircraft operates more direct routes? Also, once a flight plan is accepted, is the routing usually adhered to except for minor deviations to avoid the weather or might significant rerouting be made en route?

Lastly, I don't know the Mach number of the Boeing 777 that you fly, but how does the fuel consumption (and other operating costs) increase if a stretched version such as the 777-300 is flown? I heard that a DC8-60 carries 40% more passengers than a DC8-50 but cost only 5 % more to operate - that could be an exaggeration. How much more fuel does the 777-300 use when compared with a 777-200 on a similar length flight and is it cheaper per seat mile?

Thanks again for a very informative site.

Best wishes

Peter Gordon

Hi Peter,

1. The penalty of height loss in the event of an engine failure would depend on the weight of the aircraft. It would be more if it were heavy and vice versa. Routes from Hong Kong to Europe would be planned such that it would satisfy the performance requirement otherwise it would be illegal to proceed. It is possible that the Boeing 777 or Airbus A330 may at times be planned to fly on an indirect route due to terrain.

2. The length of the route can vary because of overlying rights. Depending on the country the plane is over-flying, the routes are normally adhered to according to the flight plan. Minor deviation is allowed due to weather. Any significant deviations are not normally allowed unless the routing is resubmitted by the company's ground operations. Yes, flight times can be reduced if more direct routes are available. In fact, FANS (Future Air Navigation System) using direct routes are already being launched in certain specific regions of the world but not between Hong Kong and Europe yet.

3. I have not gone into the specifics of comparing the fuel consumption of the Boeing 777-300 and the 777-200. Since the former has a higher gross weight, I believe the fuel consumption would be slightly more. Overall, because of the larger seating capacity on the stretched plane, it would be more economical in terms of per seat mile.

Save this to del.icio.us

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 
 

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.5 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev

Free Page Rank Tool

Latest Comments
Would a marijuana possession...
Mr.
Would a single expunged marijuana...
09/05/08 17:55 More...
By Aaron Kinberg

Old Aviators and Old...
The Mustang story . . .
Hello, My name is Lea MacDonald, and as...
04/05/08 08:32 More...
By Lea

Why was Boeing 777 pilot...
Cathay Boeing 777 Captain loses appeal..
For the latest on the above, please...
19/04/08 14:55 More...
By Captain Lim

Malaysia Airlines Cadet...
don"t be so stress
:) hai...i'm also got the same problems...
17/04/08 03:38 More...
By airliners

Could this accident have been...
Accident report
Just as an info, the official Transport...
16/04/08 15:47 More...
By Johnny Lai

© 2008 Ask Captain Lim ~ All about Aviation
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.